Human review of
AI-assisted code

What you receive

PDF review report

Findings organized by priority, with code references, explanations, and recommended changes.

Repository documentation

Documentation covering the reviewed areas, setup, or maintenance needs, as defined in your quote.

Pull requests for fixes

When the agreed scope includes implementation, I submit proposed fixes through a pull request with an explanation of the changes and relevant testing. You review and decide whether to merge them.

Your quote specifies the areas reviewed, documentation, implementation work, testing, and delivery timing.

Review process

1. Share the repository.

   Send the GitHub link, a reply email, and anything you want me to focus on. For private work, invite my GitHub account.

2. I assess the scope and quote.

   I’ll look at what you’re asking for and reply by email with a proposed scope, deliverables, price, and timing. This intake assessment isn’t the full review.

3. You accept or decline.

   Reply to the quote. No automatic checkout, subscription, or paid commitment from submitting the form.

4. I review and deliver the agreed work.

   I manually review the repository and deliver the PDF report and documentation within our agreed scope, along with a pull request when fixes are included.

Review areas

• Bugs, risky behavior, and assumptions that need checking.
• How the code is organized and how understandable it is.
• Areas that look fragile, inconsistent, or hard to maintain.
• Testing gaps and specific concerns you have about the generated code.

A specialist security audit requires a separate agreement. A review can’t guarantee that every issue will be found.

Reviewer background

B.S. Software Engineering · Arizona State University, 2024. Degree verification available on request.

My experience includes application development, C# enterprise software maintenance, APIs, and game systems.